Missouri Case Party

Garrett Loomis Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: garrett-loomis
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Employment Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment Law Civil Litigation Personal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Garrett Loomis

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 5, 2022

Garrett Loomis vs. Scott Bowers and Lea Booker

Appellant

Garrett Loomis sued Scott Bowers and Lea Booker, security guards at Ameristar Casino, for negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress after they allegedly forced him to leave due to a disability mistaken for intoxication. The trial court dismissed Loomis's common law claims, finding them preempted by the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). The appellate court affirmed, holding that 2017 amendments to the MHRA did not eliminate individual liability for discrimination in public accommodation, and therefore, the MHRA continues to preempt common law claims in this area.

Employment Law Civil Litigation Personal Injury