Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Gerald Puetz, David Puetz, and Jeannette Puetz Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
gerald-puetz-david-puetz-and-jeannette-puetz
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Gerald Puetz, David Puetz, and Jeannette Puetz

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Siblings David, Jeannette, and Gerald Puetz appealed a trial court judgment enforcing an attorney's lien filed by their former attorney, Canice Timothy Rice, against their shares of a partition sale. The appellate court dismissed the appeal due to the Puetzes' brief failing to comply with mandatory appellate briefing rules, specifically Rule 84.04, rendering their points on appeal unintelligible and unpreserved. The court also granted Rice's motion for attorney's fees on appeal, finding the appeal frivolous, and remanded the case for the trial court to determine the reasonable amount of fees and expenses.