Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Hani Daifallah, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
hani-daifallah-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Hani Daifallah, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Sep 24, 2019

Alpha Petroleum Company vs. Hani Daifallah, et al

Respondent

Alpha Petroleum Company sued Hani and Mohammed Daifallah for nonpayment of fuel invoices supplied to a convenience store they operated. The trial court found the Daifallahs personally liable for the debt on a claim of nonpayment on account, but denied Alpha Petroleum's alternative claim for unjust enrichment. On appeal, the Daifallahs challenged their personal liability, arguing a corporation was responsible. The appellate court affirmed, holding that substantial evidence supported the trial court's finding that the Daifallahs were personally liable due to their failure to disclose an agency relationship. Alpha Petroleum's cross-appeal was denied as moot.