Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 16, 2025
Missouri Case Party
Harris-Stowe State University Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
- Party ID
- harrisstowe-state-university
- Cases Shown
- 2
- Top Practice Route
- Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Legal Help From The Archive
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Cases Involving Harris-Stowe State University
Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.
Appellant
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 4, 2021
Lynne Harrison, Respondent, v. Harris-Stowe State University, Appellant, and Emmanuel Lalande and Tammy Bramwell-Kimbrough, Defendants.
Lynne Harrison sued Harris-Stowe State University under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) for retaliatory discharge, age and gender discrimination, and hostile work environment. A jury found in favor of Harrison on her retaliatory discharge claim, awarding $32,000 in actual damages, and the trial court awarded attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. The appellate court affirmed the judgment for actual damages and attorneys' fees, but reversed the award of litigation expenses, remanding for the trial court to determine which out-of-pocket expenses could be included in attorneys' fees. The court also granted Harrison's request for appellate attorneys' fees and remanded for their determination.