Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Heartland Trophy Properties, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
heartland-trophy-properties-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Heartland Trophy Properties, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 4, 2023

Peter Loew and Kathy Loew vs. Heartland Trophy Properties, Inc.

Respondent

Peter and Kathy Loew (Loews) sought a declaratory judgment to void noncompete agreements with Heartland Trophy Properties, Inc. (Heartland). The circuit court granted Heartland's motion to transfer venue to Iowa and dismissed the Loews' petition without prejudice, also denying the Loews' request for sanctions. The appellate court affirmed the denial of sanctions, but reversed the transfer of venue and dismissal, finding the circuit court erred in applying Rule 51.045 and the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The case was remanded for further proceedings.