Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Heath Hartman, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
heath-hartman-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Heath Hartman, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 25, 2021

Gary Coleman vs. Heath Hartman, et al

Respondent

Gary Coleman appealed a trial court judgment awarding title to 0.35 acres of his property to Heath and Kellie Hartman based on adverse possession. Coleman argued that the evidence did not support the Hartmans' claims of boundary by acquiescence or adverse possession. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding substantial evidence supported the Hartmans' claim of adverse possession, thereby rendering the boundary by acquiescence claim moot.