Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

H.L. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
hl
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving H.L.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 19, 2024

In the Interest of: K.A.L.; Juvenile Officer vs. H.L.

Respondent

The Juvenile Officer appealed the circuit court's judgment denying the petition to terminate the parental rights of H.L. (Father) concerning Child K.A.L. The Juvenile Officer argued the trial court misapplied the law, that its judgment was not supported by substantial evidence regarding statutory grounds for termination, and that it abused its discretion concerning the child's best interest. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no error in the trial court's application of the law and concluding that its findings denying termination were supported by substantial evidence.