St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Impact Agape Ministries, C. Kenneth Hayes, and Hosea Jackson, II Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
impact-agape-ministries-c-kenneth-hayes-and-hosea-jackson-ii
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Impact Agape Ministries, C. Kenneth Hayes, and Hosea Jackson, II

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

David L. Jones appealed from a trial court judgment in favor of defendants Impact Agape Ministries, C. Kenneth Haynes, and Hosea Jackson II, on his breach of contract claim. The trial court had entered judgment for the defendants after a trial de novo, which followed an initial dismissal for failure to prosecute. The appellate court reversed and remanded, finding that no record of the trial de novo was made, which precluded appellate review and necessitated a remand for a proper record to be created.

Corporate LawCivil Litigation