Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Kenneth Smith Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
in-the-matter-of-the-care-and-treatment-of-kenneth-smith
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Kenneth Smith

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 21, 2020

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Kenneth Smith vs. State of Missouri

Appellant

Kenneth Smith, civilly committed as a sexually violent predator, petitioned for conditional release from the Department of Mental Health. The trial court denied his petition, finding he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he no longer suffered from a mental abnormality making him likely to commit acts of sexual violence if conditionally released. On appeal, Smith contended the trial court erred in denying him a trial on his petition. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding that its finding was supported by the weight of the evidence, particularly given the State's vigorous cross-examination of Smith's expert witnesses.