Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Isabella Gray-Ross Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
isabella-grayross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Personal Injury ConsultationCall About A Personal Injury Claim

Cases Involving Isabella Gray-Ross

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 22, 2022

Isabella Gray-Ross, Appellant, vs. St. Louis Public Schools, Respondents.

Appellant

Isabella Gray-Ross sued individual employees of St. Louis Public Schools for negligence after she was attacked during a high school soccer match, sustaining a traumatic brain injury and orbital blowout fracture. The trial court granted the individual respondents' motions to dismiss, finding them protected by official immunity. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the duties alleged against both the security guard and supervisory personnel were discretionary, not ministerial, and therefore official immunity barred Gray-Ross's claims as a matter of law.

Personal InjuryCivil Litigation