This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
jack-murphy
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Neil Steiner appealed pro se from a summary judgment granted to Jack Murphy on an unlawful detainer claim. The appellate court dismissed the appeal because Steiner's brief failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of Rule 84.04, specifically regarding points relied on, argument development, and the statement of facts. The court noted that Steiner had previously been given an opportunity to rectify similar deficiencies but failed to do so adequately.
Jack Murphy, as agent and owner of Dahle's Property Solutions, LLC, sought possession and damages from Neil and Deborah Steiner on theories of unlawful detainer and rent and possession. The trial court granted summary judgment to Murphy on the unlawful detainer claim, awarding possession and monetary damages. On appeal, the Western District dismissed the appeal, holding that the trial court's judgment was not final because it failed to resolve the pending rent and possession claim and the Steiners' affirmative claim for relief.