Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

James Barger Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
james-barger
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving James Barger

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 24, 2018

James Barger vs. Kansas City Power & Light Company

Appellant

James Barger, an employee of a contractor, sued Kansas City Power & Light Company (KCP&L) for negligence after being injured at a KCP&L plant. KCP&L moved for summary judgment, asserting Barger was a statutory employee under Missouri's Workers' Compensation Law, which would bar his negligence claim. The trial court granted summary judgment for KCP&L. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that genuine disputes of material fact existed regarding whether Barger's work was within KCP&L's usual course of business, thus precluding summary judgment on the statutory employee defense.