Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

James Hurley Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
james-hurley
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving James Hurley

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 13, 2019

Russell Scott Lynch vs. James Hurley

Respondent

Russell Scott Lynch appealed the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment, seeking credit against his St. Charles County sentences for time spent in St. Louis County jail and in a long-term treatment program. The trial court dismissed the claim for jail time credit based on collateral estoppel from a prior habeas judgment and dismissed the treatment program credit claim for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal regarding the treatment program credit but reversed and remanded the jail time credit claim, holding that the habeas court's ruling on the merits of a non-cognizable claim had no preclusive effect.