Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jamie Snethen Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jamie-snethen
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jamie Snethen

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 25, 2025

Jamie Snethen vs. Missouri State Board of Nursing

Appellant

Jamie Snethen, a licensed practical nurse, appealed the circuit court's judgment affirming the Missouri State Board of Nursing's order. The Board imposed additional discipline on Snethen's nursing license after she violated the terms of her probation, which included alcohol abstinence and daily check-ins. Snethen argued the Board abused its discretion in denying a continuance, that the discipline was unsupported by evidence, and that the alcohol restrictions violated the ADA. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no prejudice from the continuance denial, sufficient evidence for the discipline, and that Snethen waived her challenge to the 2018 order and failed to prove an ADA violation for the 2023 order.