Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

JANE DOE, as next friend on behalf of JOHN DOE MINOR, a minor Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jane-doe-as-next-friend-on-behalf-of-john-doe-minor-a-minor
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving JANE DOE, as next friend on behalf of JOHN DOE MINOR, a minor

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Jane Doe, a high-schooler, sued her teacher and school district in tort after the teacher allegedly refused her urgent restroom request, causing her to wet herself. The trial court granted summary judgment for both defendants based on sovereign immunity for the District and official immunity or the public-duty doctrine for the Teacher. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment for the District, finding no waiver of sovereign immunity. However, it reversed and remanded the summary judgment for the Teacher, concluding that he had not established his right to judgment as a matter of law on his immunity defenses.