Missouri Case Party

Janelle Carson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: janelle-carson
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Employment Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment Law Corporate Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Janelle Carson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 12, 2023

GFS, II, LLC vs. Janelle Carson

Respondent

GFS, II, LLC (Gateway) sued Janelle Carson for defaulting on a car loan, and Carson counterclaimed alleging violations related to a defective vehicle and an extended warranty. After two years of litigation, Gateway moved to compel arbitration, which the circuit court denied, finding Gateway had waived its right. The appellate court affirmed, holding that waiver-by-litigation claims are for the court to decide, not an arbitrator, and that Gateway's substantial participation in discovery and litigation, including requesting a jury trial, constituted a waiver of its right to arbitrate.

Employment Law Corporate Law Civil Litigation