Missouri Case Party

Janet Perea and Mav Mirfasihi Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: janet-perea-and-mav-mirfasihi
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Corporate Law Insurance Bad Faith

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Janet Perea and Mav Mirfasihi

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 31, 2023

Janet Perea and Mav Mirfasihi vs. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company

Appellant

Janet Perea and Mav Mirfasihi appealed a summary judgment granted to Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company regarding Perea's personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. Appellants claimed Progressive breached its insurance contract by failing to timely pay benefits and violated the attorney lien statute by paying a medical provider directly. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment, finding Progressive had reasonable proof for its payment delays and that Kansas law, which allows assignment of PIP benefits, applied to the insurance contract between Kansas residents.

Corporate Law Civil Litigation Insurance Bad Faith