Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jason A. Kaesser Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jason-a-kaesser
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jason A. Kaesser

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 25, 2020

Jason A. Kaesser vs. State of Missouri

Appellant

Jason A. Kaesser appealed the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, claiming his guilty plea to assault of a corrections officer was involuntary due to ineffective assistance of counsel. He alleged his first appointed counsel coerced him by stating a six-year sentence was the best plea offer he would receive, leading to his fear of a longer sentence if he went to trial. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's judgment, finding that Kaesser's claims of coercion were conclusively refuted by the record, as his plea hearing testimony showed he received reports and discussed the case with counsel, and the advice given was not untrue.