Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jason S. Meyer Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jason-s-meyer
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jason S. Meyer

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Nov 8, 2022

Pecos I, LLC, Respondent, vs. Jason S. Meyer, Appellant.

Appellant

Jason S. Meyer executed promissory notes in favor of Pecos I, LLC, secured by two classic cars. Pecos sued Meyer for payment on the notes and judicial foreclosure, while Meyer counterclaimed for abuse of process and filed a third-party petition against Kolb Meyer Bioenergy NMI (KBNMI) and Stephen R. Krause for fraudulent misrepresentation. The trial court granted summary judgment for Pecos on the notes and foreclosure, and for KBNMI and Krause on the fraudulent misrepresentation claims. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment on the notes and foreclosure, and for Krause on the fraud claim, but reversed the summary judgment for KBNMI on the fraudulent misrepresentation claim, finding a genuine issue of material fact regarding Meyer's reliance.