Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jeffrey Jay Fulton Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jeffrey-jay-fulton
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jeffrey Jay Fulton

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 7, 2023

Elaina Marie (Fulton) Sansone vs. Jeffrey Jay Fulton

Respondent

Elaina Marie Sansone appealed the modification of child support, arguing the trial court erred in abating payments from Jeffrey Jay Fulton during the eight months their child attended college. Sansone contended she had ongoing expenses not covered by the college expense payments, thus making the abatement an erroneous application of the law. The Western District affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion as the evidence supported a finding of redundancy between Husband's direct payments for college and other expenses and his child support payments.