Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jennifer A. Britt Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jennifer-a-britt
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jennifer A. Britt

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 26, 2019

Jennifer A. Britt vs. Jeremy M. Otto

Appellant

American Family Mutual Insurance Company appealed the trial court's denial of its motion to intervene in an action filed by Jennifer Britt to confirm an arbitration award against Jeremy Otto, American Family's insured. American Family argued it had a right to intervene under section 537.065.2 or Rule 52.12, or permissively under Rule 52.12(b)(2). The appellate court affirmed, holding that American Family did not have a statutory right to intervene because its motion was untimely, nor a right to intervene under Rule 52.12(a)(2) because its interest as a potential indemnitor was not direct. The court also found no abuse of discretion in denying permissive intervention.