This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
jennifer-l-schutter
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Paul Seibold (Father) appealed the trial court's dismissal of domestic proceedings, including his family access motion and motion to quash garnishment, based on the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision to decline jurisdiction over child custody modification issues, finding no error in the lack of findings of fact due to an untimely and improperly served request. However, the court reversed the dismissal of Father's family access motion and motion to quash garnishment, holding that the UCCJEA's jurisdictional provisions do not apply to these types of enforcement actions. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Father appealed the Missouri court's denial of his family access and contempt motions, and his motions to modify child support, all based on the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The Missouri court had dismissed Father's motions, concluding it lacked jurisdiction after a Texas court issued a temporary custody order. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of Father's family access and contempt motions, holding that the Missouri court lost jurisdiction over custody matters once the Texas court issued a modification order. However, the court reversed the dismissal of Father's motions to modify child support, clarifying that the UCCJEA does not govern child support proceedings.