Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jeremy Scott, and Stephanie Scott Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jeremy-scott-and-stephanie-scott
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jeremy Scott, and Stephanie Scott

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Jeremy and Stephanie Scott sued Farm Bureau Town and Country Insurance Co. of Missouri, seeking coverage and indemnification for a car accident, alleging their policy was in effect. Farm Bureau moved for summary judgment, claiming it had non-renewed the policy by mailing notice. The Scotts denied receiving notice and argued Farm Bureau's notice method did not comply with statutory requirements. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment, finding genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the notice of non-renewal was properly sent as required by law.