Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

JESSE WARREN DEVORE Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jesse-warren-devore
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving JESSE WARREN DEVORE

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 30, 2023

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. JESSE WARREN DEVORE, Appellant

Appellant

Jesse Warren Devore was convicted of six counts of sexual misconduct involving a child after five boys reported separate incidents of him exposing himself or masturbating in public. Devore appealed the judgment, raising five points of error, including the trial court's failure to declare a mistrial, the admission of video evidence, the sufficiency of the evidence for two counts, and the refusal to sever counts. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no merit in any of Devore's points on appeal.