Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Jimmy Fields Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jimmy-fields
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Jimmy Fields

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Claimant Jimmy Fields appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of workers' compensation benefits from the Second Injury Fund for permanent total disability (PTD) due to hearing loss and permanent partial disability (PPD) for several back injuries. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's denial of PPD benefits for the back injuries and the alternative PTD claim for the last back injury, finding them supported by sufficient evidence. However, the court reversed the Commission's denial of PTD benefits for hearing loss, concluding it was not supported by sufficient competent evidence, and remanded the case for an award of PTD consistent with the opinion.