Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

John D. Matthews Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
john-d-matthews
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving John D. Matthews

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Lisa Matthews appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's dismissal of her motion to be substituted as a party in her late husband's workers' compensation case. She sought to receive his permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund as a surviving dependent. The Commission dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the final award did not establish her dependency at the time of the injury. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the final award's mere mention of marriage was insufficient to establish dependency as a matter of law, thus depriving the Commission of authority to grant relief.