Missouri Case Party

John Hendel and Patricia Hendel, Respondents, and City of Maplewood, Missouri Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: john-hendel-and-patricia-hendel-respondents-and-city-of-maplewood-missouri
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Personal Injury

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal Injury Civil Litigation Slip and Fall

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving John Hendel and Patricia Hendel, Respondents, and City of Maplewood, Missouri

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 18, 2022

Belinda Wilkins, Appellant, v. John Hendel and Patricia Hendel, Respondents, and City of Maplewood, Missouri, Defendant.

Respondent

Belinda Wilkins sued John and Patricia Hendel for negligence and nuisance after falling into an uncovered sewer vent on a public right-of-way adjacent to their property. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Hendels, finding they owed no duty to Wilkins. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the Hendels did not make a "special use" of the public right-of-way, which would have created a duty to maintain or repair the sewer vent.

Personal Injury Slip and Fall Civil Litigation