Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

John N. Parke Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
john-n-parke
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving John N. Parke

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 16, 2020

John N. Parke, Appellant, v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Respondent.

Appellant

John N. Parke sued Progressive Casualty Insurance Company for fraudulent misrepresentation after purchasing a vehicle that he later discovered had been involved in a major accident and was potentially a salvage vehicle. The trial court granted summary judgment for Progressive, finding Parke had no private right of action under the salvage statutes and thus no duty could be imposed. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that a common law claim for fraudulent misrepresentation can arise from a violation of the salvage statutes, and that a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether Progressive had declared the vehicle a salvage.