Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

John R. Wright Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
john-r-wright
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving John R. Wright

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 15, 2020

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. John R. Wright, Appellant.

Appellant

John R. Wright appealed his convictions for second-degree robbery, armed criminal action, and third-degree assault, raising two points of plain error. First, he argued that his Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy was violated because third-degree assault is a lesser-included offense of second-degree robbery. Second, he contended the trial court erred by not directly answering a jury question about whether fists could be a "dangerous instrument." The Eastern District of Missouri affirmed the judgment, finding no plain error in either point.