Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Joseph Zwillenberg, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
joseph-zwillenberg-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Joseph Zwillenberg, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 25, 2021

JTB Properties, LLC. vs. Joseph Zwillenberg, et al

Respondent

JTB Properties, LLC (Purchaser) appealed the trial court's partial summary judgment for Joseph and Julie Zwillenberg (Sellers) and the denial of its cross-motion for summary judgment in a real estate contract dispute. The Purchaser argued the trial court misapplied the law and ignored genuine issues of material fact regarding the failed closing of a property sale. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment for Sellers on the breach of contract for damages claim (Count II) but reversed and remanded the summary judgment for Sellers on the specific performance claim (Count I), finding a genuine issue of material fact.