Missouri Case Party

JOSHUA L. OLDHAM Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: joshua-l-oldham
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Criminal Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving JOSHUA L. OLDHAM

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Mar 18, 2022

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. JOSHUA L. OLDHAM, Appellant

Appellant

Joshua L. Oldham appealed his convictions for first-degree murder and armed criminal action, arguing insufficient evidence of deliberation and that the trial court erred by denying his motion to continue based on COVID-19's impact on jury selection. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, affirmed the judgment. The court found sufficient evidence for a reasonable juror to conclude Oldham acted with deliberation, citing his actions before, during, and after the shooting. Additionally, the court ruled that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a speculative motion for continuance regarding jury composition.

Criminal Law Civil Litigation