Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

JPAM Consulting, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
jpam-consulting-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving JPAM Consulting, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 19, 2022

Trina Dorsey, Respondent, v. JPAM Consulting, Inc., Appellant.

Appellant

JPAM Consulting, Inc. appealed the trial court's denial of its motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of Trina Dorsey, who had sued JPAM for violations of the Missouri Human Rights Act and the Whistleblower's Protection Act. JPAM argued it had a meritorious defense and good cause for the default due to a miscommunication with its counsel. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that JPAM failed to meet its burden of proof to set aside the default judgment because its motion was not verified or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony.