Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kansas City Pediatrics, LLC, and Scott Dattel, M.D. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kansas-city-pediatrics-llc-and-scott-dattel-md
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Medical Malpractice
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kansas City Pediatrics, LLC, and Scott Dattel, M.D.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Z.R., a minor, sued Kansas City Pediatrics, LLC, and Scott Dattel, M.D., for medical malpractice related to the alleged negligent failure to diagnose and treat her hip dysplasia. After a jury found in favor of the defendants, the trial court granted Z.R.'s motion for a new trial, finding that a defense expert's trial testimony contradicted his deposition testimony and was not disclosed, causing substantial prejudice. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in granting a new trial due to the surprise expert testimony.