Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

KATHERINE C. BOWDEN and DOUGLAS D. BOWDEN, by and through Plaintiffs Ad Litem, KATHERINE L. BOWDEN and DAVID BOWDEN, JR., Plaintiffs- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
katherine-c-bowden-and-douglas-d-bowden-by-and-through-plaintiffs-ad-litem-katherine-l-bowden-and-david-bowden-jr-plaintiffs
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving KATHERINE C. BOWDEN and DOUGLAS D. BOWDEN, by and through Plaintiffs Ad Litem, KATHERINE L. BOWDEN and DAVID BOWDEN, JR., Plaintiffs-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Plaintiffs Katherine L. Bowden and David Bowden, Jr., acting as ad litem, sued American Modern Home Insurance Company and Barton Mutual Insurance Company for breach of contract after a property they acquired a mortgage for was destroyed by fire. The circuit court granted summary judgment for both insurers, concluding that the Note Purchase Agreement did not assign rights to insurance proceeds. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the defendants failed to make a prima facie showing for summary judgment because the assignment of policy rights occurred after the loss, which is an exception to anti-assignment clauses, and thus raised a genuine issue of material fact.