Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Katherine Sovulewski Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
katherine-sovulewski
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Katherine Sovulewski

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 29, 2022

Katherine Sovulewski, Appellant, v. Missouri State Board of Nursing, Respondent.

Appellant

Katherine Sovulewski appealed the trial court's judgment affirming the Missouri State Board of Nursing's order setting probationary terms for her RN license. The appellate court determined that the Board's action of setting probation terms was a non-contested case, not a contested one, which significantly alters the required judicial review procedures. Because the trial court incorrectly applied contested case procedures, the appellate court reversed the judgment and remanded the case with instructions to allow Sovulewski to amend her petition for review under non-contested case procedures.