St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Keith Jackson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
keith-jackson
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Keith Jackson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Keith Jackson sued attorney Dennis J. Barton III and LifeSmile Dental Care, alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) stemming from debt collection efforts for dental services. The circuit court dismissed Jackson's petition, finding the FDCPA claim time-barred and the MMPA claim failing to state a cause of action. The Supreme Court of Missouri reversed, holding that Jackson's FDCPA claim was not time-barred by discrete acts within the limitations period, and that Barton's collection activities were "in connection with" the sale of dental services for purposes of the MMPA.

Real EstateCivil Litigation