St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Keith Lewis Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
keith-lewis
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Workers' CompensationCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Workers' Compensation ConsultationCall About A Workers' Compensation Claim

Cases Involving Keith Lewis

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 14, 2023

Keith Lewis, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

Appellant

Keith Lewis appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision dismissing his application for review of an Administrative Law Judge's dismissal of his workers' compensation claim against the Second Injury Fund. The appellate court found that Lewis's brief failed to substantially comply with Rule 84.04, which governs appellate briefing requirements. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, holding that nothing was preserved for appellate review due to the briefing deficiencies.

Workers' CompensationCivil Litigation