Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kenneth Jones and Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kenneth-jones-and-treasurer-of-the-state-of-missouricustodian-of-the-second-injury-fund
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Workers' Compensation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kenneth Jones and Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Harley-Davidson Motor Company and its insurer appealed a final award from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of Kenneth Jones for a work-related injury. Appellants argued Jones failed to provide timely written notice of his lower back injury and that the Commission failed to make specific factual findings. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, holding that the employer was not prejudiced by the lack of written notice because it had actual knowledge of the workplace injury. The court also found the Commission properly adopted the ALJ's factual findings and conclusions of law.