This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
kenneth-newman-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Need help turning court research into a case plan?
If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.
Bradley Burgan appealed the dismissal of his defamation claim against Kenneth D. Newman, Corina Newman, and Ted F. Frapolli. The appellate court dismissed Burgan's appeal for failure to substantially comply with the briefing requirements of Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.04. The court found that the brief's statement of facts was deficient, the points relied on failed to concisely state legal reasons, and there was a complete failure to present a legal argument demonstrating reversible error, preventing the court from conducting a meaningful review without becoming an advocate.