Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kent Chapline Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kent-chapline
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationFamily Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Litigation ConsultationCall About A Litigation Claim

Cases Involving Kent Chapline

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Sep 21, 2021

K.C. vs. Kent Chapline

Respondent

K.C. sought and obtained a renewal of a full order of protection against Kent Chapline. Chapline, a Texas resident, appealed the renewal, asserting the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over him and that K.C. failed to present sufficient evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding that the trial court retained personal jurisdiction and that substantial evidence supported the renewal of the protective order.

Family LawCivil Litigation