Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

KEVIN DARNELL COASTON Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kevin-darnell-coaston
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving KEVIN DARNELL COASTON

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Oct 30, 2020

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. KEVIN DARNELL COASTON, Appellant

Appellant

Kevin Darnell Coaston appealed his conviction for domestic assault in the fourth degree following a bench trial, arguing the trial court erred by admitting testimony from the victim's mother regarding his past domestic abuse against her. Coaston contended this evidence was irrelevant, violated his constitutional rights, and allowed an impermissible inference of propensity. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, holding that in a bench trial, the judge is presumed not to rely on inadmissible evidence unless the record clearly shows otherwise, and Coaston failed to demonstrate such reliance or prejudice.