Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kevin P. McLaughlin Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kevin-p-mclaughlin
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kevin P. McLaughlin

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Dec 21, 2021

Kathleen M. McLaughlin, Respondent, v. Kevin P. McLaughlin, Appellant.

Appellant

Kevin P. McLaughlin (Father) appealed the trial court's judgment denying his motion to modify child support, relieving him of private school tuition, and granting Kathleen M. McLaughlin (Mother) sole legal custody. Father argued he met the burden for modification due to changes in income and custody time, and that the court punished him. The appellate court affirmed, finding Father failed to prove a substantial and continuing change in circumstances to reduce child support and that his conduct justified the sole legal custody award to Mother. The court also noted Father benefited from being relieved of private school tuition.