Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kirkwood School District Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kirkwood-school-district
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kirkwood School District

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 8, 2021

Brenda Linkous, Appellant, v. Kirkwood School District, Respondent.

Respondent

Brenda Linkous sued Kirkwood School District (KSD) for negligence after she was injured in its parking lot. KSD moved for summary judgment, arguing Linkous was its statutory employee under Section 287.040 RSMo, making workers' compensation her exclusive remedy. The trial court granted summary judgment for KSD. The appellate court affirmed, holding that KSD established all elements of statutory employment, including that Linkous's work was performed under contract and was part of KSD's usual business, despite Linkous's arguments regarding preemption and specialization.