Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

K.L.S. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kls
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving K.L.S.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 19, 2019

K.L.S. vs. Union Pacific Railroad and Timothy Espy

Appellant

K.L.S., a City employee, sued Union Pacific Railroad and Timothy Espy for negligence and negligence per se after she was attacked in a public alleyway while photographing zoning violations on an adjacent property. The trial court granted summary judgment for Union Pacific. On appeal, K.L.S. argued that Union Pacific owed her a duty of care and that the trial court erred by not striking certain affidavits. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Union Pacific owed no duty to K.L.S. for an attack by an unknown third party in a public alleyway not owned or adjacent to Union Pacific's property, and that the motion to strike affidavits became moot when Union Pacific withdrew them.