Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Kristy Richards Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kristy-richards
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Kristy Richards

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Kristy Richards filed an equitable garnishment action against The Bunkhouse Bar & Grill, LLC's insurer, Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company, seeking to recover the full $405,000 judgment she received for bodily injury. The underlying judgment was based on the Bunkhouse's common law negligence, while a battery claim against the owner was unsuccessful due to self-defense. The trial court limited Richards' recovery to a $25,000 policy sublimit, finding the assault and battery exclusion applied and the concurrent proximate cause rule did not. The appellate court affirmed, agreeing that the exclusion applied because Richards' injuries arose from an assault and battery, and the Bunkhouse's negligence was not an independent cause for the concurrent proximate cause rule to apply.