Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Lakeith R. Courtney Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
lakeith-r-courtney
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Lakeith R. Courtney

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 21, 2023

Lakeith R. Courtney vs. State of Missouri

Appellant

Lakeith R. Courtney appealed the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Courtney argued that the sentencing court denied him due process and meaningful allocution by refusing to consider evidence related to self-defense as mitigation during his sentencing after he pleaded guilty to murder and armed criminal action. The appellate court affirmed the motion court's denial, finding no clear error. It held that a guilty plea waives self-defense as an absolute defense, and the sentencing court's ruling did not prohibit Courtney from presenting mitigating evidence, but merely clarified that self-defense would not be considered as a defense.