Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Lee Kouadio-Tobey Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
lee-kouadiotobey
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment ConsultationCall About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving Lee Kouadio-Tobey

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Aug 30, 2022

Lee Kouadio-Tobey vs. Division of Employment Security

Appellant

Lee Kouadio-Tobey appealed a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which had affirmed the Appeals Tribunal's finding that Kouadio-Tobey's appeal from a denial of unemployment benefits was untimely. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, concluding that Kouadio-Tobey's brief materially violated Rule 84.04, thereby preserving no issues for review. The court found deficiencies in the statement of facts, points relied on, and argument section.

Employment LawCivil Litigation