Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Legacy Building Maintenance Company LLC and William Rostad, Defendants, and Luis Zambrana Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
legacy-building-maintenance-company-llc-and-william-rostad-defendants-and-luis-zambrana
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Legacy Building Maintenance Company LLC and William Rostad, Defendants, and Luis Zambrana

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

James P. Bick appealed the dismissal of his petition against Luis Zambrana for lack of personal jurisdiction. Bick's law firm had contracted with Legacy Building Maintenance Company, LLC, where Zambrana served as president, and sought to pierce the corporate veil to hold Zambrana personally liable for an unpaid balance. The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal, holding that Bick sufficiently pleaded that Zambrana transacted business and committed a tort in Missouri, thereby satisfying the state's long-arm statute and due process requirements for minimum contacts.