Missouri Case Party

Liquor Control, Et Al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: liquor-control-et-al
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Corporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Liquor Control, Et Al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 24, 2023

Quincy Clark Entertainment, LLC vs. Liquor Control, Et Al

Respondent

Quincy Clark Entertainment, LLC appealed the circuit court's dismissal of its petition for administrative review of a liquor license revocation. The circuit court dismissed the case with prejudice, determining it lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, holding that the petition for administrative review was untimely filed under section 536.110.1, which deprived the circuit court of statutory authority to review the administrative decision.

Civil Litigation Corporate Law