Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Locarno Partners, LP Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
locarno-partners-lp
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Locarno Partners, LP

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 9, 2019

Carlos Guerra vs. Locarno Partners, LP

Respondent

Carlos Guerra appealed the circuit court's judgment, which ruled against him on his claims of intentional interference with contract and breach of contract, and in favor of Locarno Partners, LP, on its counterclaims for breach of lease agreements. The appellate court dismissed Guerra's appeal due to numerous and significant briefing deficiencies, including a nonsensical point relied on, an argumentative statement of facts, and undeveloped arguments, all in violation of Rule 84.04.